tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7765094200998228719.post1436986714107515501..comments2024-03-27T22:53:21.416-05:00Comments on JOHNGY'S BEAT: Cards That Never Were: Jackie Smith Topps 1966, '77, '78 and '79 (x2)Johngyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18416011578421652629noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7765094200998228719.post-80350600168668222862021-01-17T09:20:33.926-06:002021-01-17T09:20:33.926-06:00John-You see that a lot on 1960s baseball cards. T...John-You see that a lot on 1960s baseball cards. Those guys were 30ish looking 50.Johngyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18416011578421652629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7765094200998228719.post-42015166797868131172021-01-16T21:42:55.340-06:002021-01-16T21:42:55.340-06:00Nice '66 Philly Gum card!
I'm not sure ab...Nice '66 Philly Gum card!<br /><br />I'm not sure about the '66 set, but in '67, nobody was wearing a helmet except for most of the Giants, and 3 Colts.Jim from Downingtownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7765094200998228719.post-17062634403464544112021-01-16T08:45:34.464-06:002021-01-16T08:45:34.464-06:00Why do players from the past look so old. Jackie S...Why do players from the past look so old. Jackie Smith could not be more than 37 (last time he played with Cardinals) but he looks over 55 years old in that Photo.John Batemanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14159036395402962119noreply@blogger.com